Sunday, December 25, 2016

VOX POPULI

by

S Kamat
as
Aam Admi

Issue: 181                Date:  26.12.2016

 
Contents:

1.      The Bumbling Jaitley as Finance Minister Exposed in the Demonetisation Exercise

2.      Modi Has Brought The Country To Its Knees With Demonetisation

3.      Dumb & Dumber: The Mediocre Shall Rule The World

4.      Demonetisation Woes Continue To Add Up But No Compassionate Action by the Government

5.      Political Parties Let Off The Hook

6.      In Politicians Deal Making, Interests of Citizens Are Sacrificed



The Bumbling Jaitley as Finance Minister Exposed in the Demonetisation Exercise

Where in the world would you see a Finance Minister being kept away from a major economic policy decision like demonetisation of high denomination currency notes? It does happen and in India. In fact on Nov 8th, 2016 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi withdrew the Rs. 500 and the Rs. 1000 as legal tender Arun Jaitley his Finance Minister was not aware of this until Modi had called a meeting of the Cabinet moments before he went on national television to announce it to the nation. Was it because as per media reports it was Jaitley who had exchanged cash amounting to some Rs. 68 lakhs of the demonetised notes, the highest among all Cabinet Ministers, just after Nov 8th? Was Modi aware of Jaitley's stash from earlier and that is why he was kept away? 

Arun Jaitley took this slight in his stride and putting on a brave face continued to do his master's bidding in defending the demonetisation exercise. When there was crowding at banks by the public to exchange their useless currency, he exhorted the people that there was time until Dec 30 to do this and not panic. With the tsunami of the old notes being deposited in the banks in the first few weeks, Jaitley went along with the Finance Ministry officials and underestimated the amount of the old currency that would come back to RBI. Immediately word was put out that the demonetisation exercise was a success and since the RBI would not have to meet the liability of anywhere between one lakh crore to three lakh crore of rupees which was assumed to be black money which the hoarders were afraid to deposit in the banks, this money could be given as dividend to the government by RBI. The government would then use this dividend money for the benefit of the poor. But with more and more money coming into the banks and almost the entire amount likely to come in by Dec 30, this equation is not working out since the more demonetised notes coming into the banks, the less is the kitty for 'spending for the poor'. If this happens then there is a major credibility debacle for the government which they are keen to avoid. 

So what does Jaitley do but resort to kite flying? He floats the idea that there 'seems' to be some double counting in the process of the demonetised notes as they move from banks, post offices to regional currency chests. He also asks RBI to check this out. In the meanwhile under RTI the RBI releases information that on the day Nov 8th that demonetisation of the Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes were announced there was almost 30% more of these notes in circulation than the government figures that it has been releasing up to now. Is this deliberate? To show that there are still a large number of notes yet to come back and therefore the government would have a large amount of funds for spending on the poor or putting it another way that the demonetization exercise has been a success to invalidate black money. Whatever may be the truth, in all this the RBI's credibility has taken a further beating coming on top of the plethora of circulars on procedures that it has been issuing post-demonetisation.

Is this therefore a planned attack by government to discredit yet another autonomous institution, the RBI? Jaitley should answer for this since this government is already at loggerheads with the Supreme Court on judge's appointments and it seems RBI is the next target. 

RBI also played party pooper when it appropriated the huge amount of deposits coming to the banks post-demonetisation. The banks were salivating that these deposits would decorate their balance sheets which were mostly in the red because of the massive NPA's on their books. In the same manner Jaitley has been eyeing the same huge deposits coming to the banks and contrary to his saying that all cash being put in the banks in the form of the demonetised notes cannot convert it into white, he is believing hat all the deposits are black. With that he has been building castles in the air on how much tax revenue will come to the government on these deposits and how with that buoyancy he will be able to take a position to review taxation downwards for the common people. First things first, in India whether it be taxation or prices, once they go up, they never come down as our experience has shown for the last 60 years or more. Not only that just like the amount of money coming into the banks post-demonetisation was underestimated so also to Jaitley's amazement he will find that all this money or at least a majority of it is all white and tax-paid money. Thus the expectation of ballooning tax revenue will go out of the window.  In all this it is the story of taking one step forward and then taking two steps backward, nett result being that we would be worse off than what we were pre-demonetisation. This is being said since demonetisation instead of hitting black money substantially actually helped the black money hoarders to be more comfortable. Corruption has not been affected since it continues as it is in the past but with new currency. Terrorism has not been curbed since in Kashmir terrorists were found with new currency and last week's attack in Gadchiroli, Maharashtra where 80 trucks were torched shows that the red menace continues unabated. This in fact is one of the largest attacks on property in the last few years to maybe signal to the government that the Naxalites are alive and kicking and not to get complacent. 

Jaitley true to form picked up the PM's baton again to defend the change in tack of the objectives of the demonetisation exercise from the above since it obviously as spelt out were not working to announcing the cashless or 'less cash' economy.  This change of approach was also a knee-jerk decision since as it is there was no cash available, so might as well sell the idea of a cashless or 'less cash' economy! This as a concept is good but to implement it will take at least a decade or more considering educating the people on it and getting their acceptance, ensuring coverage of Net and mobile networks across the country and to scale up the support systems for such payment methods to handle large volume of transactions in a reliable and robust manner. Paytm the favourite Co. of Narendra Modi has had two scams in the space of two weeks of people cheating them. Even POS terminals have had problems with some of them masquerading as skimmers where card data is siphoned off for malpractices later. Considering this is the government thinking of certifying POS terminals so that people can ask to be shown this certification before giving their cards for payment. India has always been a large buyer in any item and this situation has affected POS terminals given the large demand of 1 million units in the next 3 months, for which the suppliers have already run into a shortage supply situation. This will jeopardise the plan of banks to dsperse these terminals as widely as possible across the country. In the same context, how people like Amitabh Kant, CEO of Niti Aayog can sing the praises of a cashless economy is something which is not understandable? Announcing the incentives to people and trade for going cashless to an estimated budget of Rs. 320 crores is a waste since you give incentives when there is a reasonable volume and to scale up this volume. In the present context when you are starting from scratch what will the incentives achieve but loss to the exchequer. This money could have been better spent on other things. Kant is also guilty of massaging data to support his arguments.  Like claiming that only 1% of Indians pay income tax is far from the truth. With farmers and their families exempt from income tax and constituting at least 70% of the population, we are already at the figure of close to 3.5%  Indians paying income tax. Layer on this the young, elderly and women among which population only 25% are eligible to pay tax. Therefore if you consider from among those Indians who have to pay income tax 14% do so. So Mr Kant, you are way off and simply using figures to justify your argument. No doubt there is a large number of Indians who though liable to income tax are not paying it and the government needs to go after them.  But that is not done by torturing the whole nation to go after maybe some 10% of the population liable to tax. The problem with Modi and his henchmen is that they get so much taken in by the task to the exclusion of the risks and after-effects as also the impact on the people likely to get affected by the decisions. Another thing that Kant mentioned is that in future if you are paying in cash, it will attract a surcharge. We have grown up to the idea that payment in cash should be eligible for discounts, now that belief is likely to be turned on its head. 

Jaitley is also not applying himself to maintaining a certain standard of performance in relation to matters related to his ministry. Take the case of the quality of currency that has been newly introduced. It has been reported that the colour has been coming off the Rs. 2000 note which has been put at the door of the intaglio ink used in its printing. In just about 45 days the Rs. 2000 note has been showing in some cases the signs of wear and tear. These are things that we are not used to in our currency but we are learning anew under Modi's dispensation where everything is negotiable and everything can be explained by some pithy and inane comment.  The Rs. 500 note seen rarely is reported to be different from one other in the shade of colour and on some of its features. Thus if you see we are given legal tender which may be varying leading to debate and nuisance when it is tendered for payment. Not only that this is the window of opportunity that counterfeiters will use to make fake notes and pass them off as genuine taking advantage of the above confusion. The Rs. 2000 note has already been photocopied and passed of as genuine in many places across the country. So we are living in a country where the currency itself may be suspect. But levity apart should not the government have ensured that all such problems with the new currency were resolved before putting them in circulation, after all the country’s reputation was at stake. A country’s currency just like its flag should be beyond question and the government of the day should ensure that it makes every effort in this regard.

Lastly the BJP and the RSS have been known for the many motor-mouths in their midst who shoot off once too often. Recently S Gurumoorthy, the go-to man in the RSS think-tank hierarchy spilt the beans that the Rs. 2000 note may be there for a short while and then would be withdrawn! Is this not enough signal to the black money hoarders to avoid keeping their caches in this denomination. Thus while Narendra Modi implemented demonetisation by closing the doors of the stable after the horses had bolted, we have Gurumoorthy nudging the doors open a little so that preparatory action is initiated. 

You latch onto Jaitley for apportioning blame on all this is because he is an educated person and an eminent advocate to boot who instead of performing his role in line with his abilities and competence is content to play second fiddle to short-sighted people and some who are downright illiterate. Thus one's blood boils when you see Jaitley mouthing inanities and making irresponsible statements. 


Modi Has Brought The Country To Its Knees With Demonetisation

The Indian economy after the ‘policy paralysis’ of the previous UPA government was in the doldrums. It was recovering slowly even after the indifferent management since the BJP-led Narendra Modi  government assumed power in 2014. On the back of two successive droughts, the monsoon had been close to normal this year across the country and augured well for growth when like a bolt out of the blue, a sudden shock was imposed upon the country by Narendra Modi by way of the mismanagement of the demonetisation of high denomination currency. It was as if a currency drought has been unleashed across the country whose impact will be much greater than any drought imposed on the economy by the failure of the monsoon. This has resulted in the future of the Indian economy becoming uncertain. Opinion is divided whether there are economic gains or losses from the demonetisation and only time will give the answer to that. In terms of Narendra Modi's action on demonetisation, any right thinking person will ask him - What was the hurry? By his own admission if black money hoarders had made merry in the country for the last 70 years, could Modi not have allowed the country the comfort of the economy to recover and when it was more on its feet, launch the war against black money? Would another year or even a few months, until more of the replacement currency was available, was something which would have been difficult to wait for? Since whether now or after a little more time, things as far as the status of black money would not have changed much. In the hurry to fight black money Narendra Modi has only ended up in putting the whole country into a mess particularly the poor and underprivileged who are not very sure of the benefits of the measure that is presently snatching away food from their mouths because of the cash shortage. 

It is a strange situation where your own money is being restricted from being withdrawn from the banks and the government in its infinite wisdom is imposing limits to how much you can draw or cannot draw and for which all purposes it will allow drawal. These are surely not signs of a democracy but that of a controlled economy. Epithets like dictatorship or autocratic restrictions or like what happens in communist countries come to one’s mind. These restrictions are for common people who are either individuals or small tradesmen. For the black money hoarders and people with money, there do not seem to be any restrictions since in raids across the country massive amounts of new currency mostly the Rs. 2000 note is being recovered. How is the new Rs. 2000 note available to hoarders in such large volume when the government stand is that it is trying to do its best to meet the needs of the people at bank counters? While the actual situation is that while common people are starved of cash the hoarders and well-heeled people are making merry. Is there a leak in the banking system? If so the bank bosses would have at least known who among their staff are prone to malpractice and should they have not isolated them from the currency handling? Or like some are saying is there a direct leak from the RBI considering quite a number of their staffers have been found complicit in siphoning out money at Bangalore? In all this the question uppermost in people’s minds is how is all this money being accounted, if at all it is being accounted? At the same time bank bosses are complaining that with bank operations under larger scrutiny and the new RBI advice that CCTV coverage from 8th Nov needs to be preserved, the morale of banking personnel who have been working hard since the demonetization has been going down. These are but excuses to get the banking system off the hook and away from scrutiny since as said earlier bank bosses should have known who were the bad potatoes among them and these people should have been moved out of direct cash operations and customer handling post-8th Nov. That would have been responsible working by top management in the banks rather than talk now of rotation of personnel at the counters so that no linkages with disreputable persons are maintained. At Axis Bank where the largest number of scams have been detected the top executive has been trying to explain away the situation and instituting audits by independent consultants and saying a few people had brought a bad name to some 50,000 employees at the bank. These are but public relations to deflect attention while actually she should resign owning up responsibility.

The government is indulging in using mass media to project the black money unearthed during raids at the present times to support its stated war against black money and to show that it is working. Actually the money unearthed during raids is miniscule compared to the projections of the black money in the Indian economy which is conservatively pegged at 25% of GDP. This attempt to give publicity to raids is to sway the minds of the gullible public by showing how many ‘crores’ are being unearthed when actually any serious efforts to eliminate black money should show the discovery and elimination in thousands of ‘crores’. The present publicity is obviously to deflect the criticism that Narendra Modi is facing that his demonetisation exercise and its sloppy implementation actually helped black money hoarders to store their ill-gotten money more easily. The people should therefore take such news with a pinch of salt since these are all recoveries from the small fry while the big fish with the real black money are sleeping the sleep of the comfortable. The media has a role to play in this and should down-play the amounts seized during such raids. In fact through this entire demonetisation measure the media has played an emasculated position blowing hot and cold and asking irrelevant questions about the merits of demonetization of which there is no doubt but the manner of implementation of the replacement of the demonetized is what was messed up helping the black money hoarders indirectly.

In its anxiety to shore up the demonetisation measure and to cover up the fact of the deliberately created cash shortage in the economy the government has launched also into a multimedia promotional campaign on unrelated and far-fetched options like going cashless. These options need a soft launch considering the appreciation and understanding of the processes by the people who are not device-friendly and the gradual upgradation of the back-up and support systems to be robust enough to put through the increasing level of transactions with the rising acceptance of the people. However, the manner in which the cashless economy is being pushed through it may only end up like many of the irrelevant schemes of government, die an unsung death. But in the process of doing so it will hurt a lot of common people with the cost of glitches, errors and incorrect transactions. In this context all the money being spent by government on these programs may end up being wasted. 

The RBI and the Finance Ministry officials like Shaktikanta Das have been trying to explain the quantum of notes, both by number and value, that the government has put out. But the logic of the Rs. 2000 note being stored by all people, including households and trade, is escaping them. The first thing it does not buy anything of daily necessity since no change is available and keeping it is a good hedge against any other surprise that Modi will spring upon them. With Rs. 100 notes in short supply and the new Rs. 500 hardly ever seen is precisely the reason why the cash shortage is persisting. Thus unless the Rs. 500 note is not released in large volume the people’s woes will not reduce. From the beginning the understanding of these simple common-sense principles has been escaping those who are in the driving-seat of the demonetization exercise. And that is precisely why the population at large has been put to untold inconvenience and misery with even deaths happening in queues at banks where people have collected to withdraw cash. People like Shaktikanta Das and those from the RBI who have been mouthing numbers of notes put back in the circulation should know that these numbers have no relevance since if people’s woes across the country are to be alleviated then dispersion of the notes is the major issue on which these people should have concentrated. On Nov 8th Narendra Modi asked for 50 days until Dec 30th which is almost upon us. Then Arun Jaitley said it could take longer about 6 months from Nov 8th given the capacity of the currency printing presses. Then we have contradictory voices coming out of government saying that things will ‘start’ improving after Dec 30th and things will become ‘normal’ latest by end March if not end Feb 2017 and at the same time saying that the number of notes put back into circulation may not be as much as was taken out on Nov 8th to make way for a ‘less-cash’ economy. This is only adding to the uncertainty in people’s minds and confirming the fact that the government probably does not know what it is doing.

When the government is indulging in publicity by way of mass media there must be someone in government who keeps track of media to judge the sentiments of the people post-demonetisation. In fact Modi himself should be keen to watch some TV news on channels that he likes to see. Does he miss the stories of people dying in queues in front of banks & ATM’s? Does he not look at the aged woman in Haryana who says that since she does not have cash, she cannot buy her medicines? Does he ignore the picture of an serviceman crying helplessly after missing his place in a queue for drawing cash? Does he think that these are fabricated stories with not an iota of truth in them? If so one must say that he has a steely heart in his 56” chest. To ignore the voice of his people and seek sacrifices to the extent of death from his countrymen, does not give Modi any label of being a humane leader. In fact by ignoring people’s woes post- demonetization, he is only confirming that he does not know what he is doing. Modi’s lack of education is hobbling his ability to look properly at the perspective of things. As a consequence he is operating far out of his depth in the present situation. Where an educated and knowledgeable person will hesitate with demonetization given its ramifications on the entire country and its economy, Modi went ahead with bravado commonly attributed to the ignorant and the muddle-headed on the measure, thinking that he would manage problems and difficulties as they came up and tackle them - Dekha Jayega. Jo Bhi Hoga Dekh Lenge! This has been disastrous for the country.  The deaths in the bank queues and as a consequence of demonetization are on his head.
These are exactly the reasons why the heads of those involved in the demonetization issue should roll starting from Narendra Modi, Urjit Patel, Shaktikanta Das, Hasmukh Adhia and those ‘wet behind the ears’ young bunch of officials who work on Modi’s social media promotion and who are understood to have also been involved in the demonetization exercise.

The emphasis being placed on the IT and other enforcement authorities is confirming the establishment of a ‘raid-raj’ being in place in the country. Initially it was the assessment of taxes for those who have deposited more than Rs. 2.5 Lakhs post 8th Nov into their bank accounts. Here the focus was on those suspected to be hoarding black money. Then came the RBI strictures on tracking work of banking personnel some of whom were seen to be complicit with the movement of large amounts of new currency to businessmen and others who were believed to be black money hoarders. Thus it as if the lens of being involved with black money is on each and every citizen. Even common people who go through their daily humdrum lives have in excess of Rs. 2 Lakhs in their accounts post-8th Nov will have to answer to the IT authorities is what is stated! Thus even if your own FD of Rs. 2 Lakhs has matured and you have put in your account after 8th Nov, your status has suddenly changed and – You Are Guilty Until Proven Innocent. This is putting the justice system on its head in present day India since the accepted norm earlier was – You Are Innocent Until Proven Guilty. This is what the country has been brought down to. Not only that the officials with the increased emphasis on raids will be in ‘raid’ mode at the cost of their normal work which like for IT officials would be assessment. Thus an unnecessary fear psychosis is being created almost equivalent to a pogrom like what the Nazis did to the Jews, Modi is looking at every Indian as a black money holder. A very sad state of affairs indeed. This is a typical example wherein a leader gets trust from the people but he does not have the moral character to reciprocate and have trust in his own people. Everybody is a thief is Modi’s present motto. This is not the end there is more.

The government has announced an email id where you can report tip offs on those who have black money. Thus we have a leader who is deliberately pitting one citizen against another. Where leaders should encourage people living together in peace and good neighbourliness, what is called bhai-chara, we have Modi wanting to split the fabric of our society by encouraging strife. Thus where people have an axe to grind against someone be it on reasons of jealousy, personal enmity, business disputes etc. the easiest way to put the opposite party in trouble is to report that he has black money. That will be the end of that fellow. Not only that such fake allegations will multiply the work of the law enforcement officials manifold to add to the already increased work-load and by the time the authorities are able to sift through the complaints, the real black money holders would have escaped for good. These are not good signs and speak of an immature and unreasonable outlook. What else can you expect from the BJP being a communal party in the first place and now out to polarize Indian society still further?

Concluding on a tone of levity maybe the concept behind the launching of the Rs. 2000 note apart from making it easier for black money hoarders and corrupt people to store their ill-gotten money also seems to be a signal that inflation will be on the rise in the years to come and will bubble up to make this note more relevant than it is today what with GST coming into force and oil prices already on the rise.


Dumb & Dumber: The Mediocre Shall Rule The World

Consistent with the old saying that – The Mediocre Shall Rule The World – we have the dumbing down of the world happening around us. First it was the US with Donald Trump being elected President and then we have Narendra Modi making a hash of the first important economic policy initiative that he undertook namely demonetization. It is being said that it was better when he was traipsing around the world in the first two years of taking over since the moment he lately stayed for a longish period in the country he stirred things up to cause untold misery to millions of Indians and put brakes on the world’s ‘fastest’ growing economy. Not only that when Narendra Modi realized in the first few days post-Nov 8th when he had announced the demonetization that things were not going right, he changed tack. From the earlier announced objectives of the demonetization being the fight against black money, corruption, counterfeiting and terrorism funding, he now announced that cashless economy was the new objective to counteract the criticism around the country of the unending cash shortage even after 45 days of Nov 8th.  This was akin to taking a child to look at the spectacle of a comet in the night sky and having missed it, trying to make do with showing it the stars in the Milky Way and claiming that the spread of the stars in that swathe of the sky was actually a comet. Whom are you fooling, Mr Modi? In his anxiety to justify demonetization as the launch of a cashless economy, Modi has got the government and the banking system thrashing around to make it work by announcing a basket of incentives for people and trade to go cashless and in the manner of offering chocolates to a child having lotteries to reward those that fall in line with cashless operation.

Then in the BJP party we have one or the other tripping on each other’s heels in praising Narendra Modi to the skies. In this day and age when qualified people tend to do this, it is rather incongruous and disappointing. We have lately Ravi Shankar Prasad, an eminent lawyer and now minister, while rebutting Rahul Gandhi’s charge of corruption against Narendra Modi claim that - Modi is as pure as the Ganga. Then we have another Minister M A Naqvi putting in his penny’s worth by saying Modi is a ‘saint’ working relentlessly to uplift the poor. Minister Venkaiah Naidu on his part has always been His Master’s Voice and at the drop of a hat will eulogise Narendra Modi. The BJP functionaries need to be careful in giving ‘phoonk’ to their beloved Narendra Modi since firstly he thinks no end of himself and with all this praise he may end up in space as India’s new satellite without even ISRO making any effort to launch him. In the context of the above comments, one can argue whether Prasad was indulging in doublespeak since as we know today the Ganga is not as pure as it was because of pollution. Is Modi’s status being equated to the present day Ganga then it stinks? As far as Naqvi calling Modi a ‘saint’ working relentlessly to uplift the poor, we all know that demonetization has hit the poor the hardest and when they were waiting for the ‘acche din’ promised by Modi, he has snatched the ‘rozi roti’ at the present times from their mouths with the promise that in the future he will feed them ‘mewa’. We have others like reputed economists like Jagadish Bhagawati and his protégé Arvind Panagariya putting their reputation on the line by defending the indefensible, that is the mess caused by demonetization by claiming that the future will be better. But these people fail to realize that there will be many people who will not be there to see that rosy future like those who died in the bank queues to exchange/withdraw  their money and on issues related to demonetization with doctors/hospitals/pharmacies not accepting the demonetized notes in the initial days after Nov 8th, those whose businesses have failed because of the cash shortage, those farmers who watched their harvest rot or wither in the fields because there was no money with their buyers to purchase the crop etc. etc. The list is long and need not be recounted here. Who will answer to their families and compensate them? Will Narendra Modi and his government do that? That RBI has been dumbing down is evidenced from the fact of its 60 circulars issued since Nov 8th on the demonetization issue and its modifying these circulars time and again and also going to the extent of reversing some of them.

The dumbing down has also spread to the Congress party and Rahul Gandhi who again raised the issue of Narendra Modi’s corruption in a puerile manner and without any realistic evidence. And in this process by meeting Modi alone on the last day of the recent session of Parliament blew the Opposition unity that had been forged on the demonetization issue. Here was an issue that was affecting all the people in India and on which the Opposition after a long time had come together and on which the Congress was also seen taking the lead and by talking about corruption, a valid but unrelated issue, Rahul Gandhi lost the opportunity to corner the incumbent government.

So the moral of the story as we go into the future in India and the world is that you should be dumb, if not be dumb and dumber, or at the least play dumb, if you want to move ahead in life.


Demonetisation Woes Continue To Add Up But No Compassionate Action by the Government

The early supporters of demonetisation like Chandrababu Naidu of the TDP, a constituent of the NDA,  and Sharad Pawar of the NCP have turned critics after becoming aware of the woes that common people are facing in the wake of the prevailing cash shortage which has also hit farmers, trade and small-scale industry. The impact of all this is bringing the economy to a shuddering halt. However, Narendra Modi and his government continues to be in denial of this ground reality and continues to push forward calling the Opposition supporters of corruption in Modi's latest salvo. This is a completely irresponsible and insensitive state of affairs for this country. Even Venezuela, a country qualifying for the epithet of a banana republic after the late President Chavez having run it to the ground, an oil exporting country with the 3rd largest known oil reserves in the world, after demonetising the 100 Bolivar note restored its use until Jan 2.  This was done because the new currency to replace the 100 Bolivar note was not available and because of the resultant cash shortage peoples Christmas shopping for a predominantly Christian population was affected and riots had broken out in some parts of the country. Thus when a country like Venezuela can be responsive to peoples needs why is India not doing it? What is Narendra Modi waiting for? For riots to break out all over the country though there have been sporadic reports of banks being looted and vandalised with people venting anger on the cash shortage. The demonetisation measure once launched and the way it was implemented could not have been revoked but then people support measures could have been introduced like free food in cities where daily wage labour has been hit and in villages where farmers have got affected because of their inability to sell their produce because of lack of cash in the market. Alternately the government could have provided free rations for a month or two to alleviate the difficulties of common people who have been the hardest hit. Instead of that the government is playing the tomtoms of the merits of the cashless economy and giving concessions and freebies to those using cashless transactions. Whom does all this help but the urban middle class and the yuppie crowd? Further, it is also clear that Narendra Modi and his government is subscribing to the saying that its right hand does not know what its left hand is doing. While the government and its ministers have been exhorting people not to crowd the banks to exchange the demonetised currency since there is time until Dec 30th. The latest circular of the RBI states that people will be questioned when they come now to exchange the demonetised currency as to why they had not done it earlier. Therefore it is time again for like minded political parties to get together and put up a unified front against the BJP and its people harassing policies.


Political Parties Let Off The Hook

We have a mention in passing and in small print presumably to hide it from the general public that political parties depositing the demonetised notes of Rs. 500 & Rs. 1000 into their bank a/c’s are exempt from income tax. This is completely irresponsible action by the government since though it is known that political parties are exempt from IT for their earnings from property etc. and from the contributions that they receive, but currently there are special circumstances in the context of the demonetization. The rules that are applicable to the common man, trade establishments, small businesses and corporate entities in terms of the quantum of demonetised notes that they can deposit and related taxation should also be applicable to political parties. They should be also liable to income tax on the amounts and penalty if applicable on these amounts. There should be no differential treatment in this regard. In the light of the exemption from taxation, the political parties and their members will take advantage of the situation and deposit their demonetised notes into the party accounts with an understanding of a refund later. With party accounts not being submitted to the Election Commission for years and no audit, there will be no way for anyone to track such deposits and later refunds. We all also know that political parties are not averse to earning a quick buck akin to commission agents promising to convert the demonetised notes to add to their coffers. Thus the political party becomes a conduit in converting black money not only of their own but also that of its members. This clearly implies that there was no intention of Narendra Modi to eliminate black money in the first place since at the front end by keeping the conditions of exchange of demonetised notes lax and thus encouraging ‘currency mules’ many black money hoarders converted their holdings to the new notes. And now at the fag end of the time limit, the government is giving another window to the black money hoarders to dump their remaining holdings through their affiliated political parties. Thus the avowed war on black money by Narendra Modi is turning into a farce. Not only that from the earlier assumed objective to demonetize the cash holdings of political parties other than the BJP prior to the upcoming State Assembly elections the present government is restoring the holdings of the political parties. This is clearly wheeling-dealing of the highest order by Narendra Modi to buy peace with the Opposition parties in the wake of massive outcry of the woes of the common man in the wake of the demonetization. Thus you once again see that the common man’s interests are sacrificed at the altar of the benefit and convenience of the political parties. To rectify the situation the government should put out a notification that as far as demonetised notes and related taxation are concerned the status of political parties will be the same as any other entities. This action will save Narendra Modi’s credibility and loss of face that is if he is bothered about it. Postscript: As is usual with this government, the very next day that Hasmukh Adhia, Secretary in the Finance Ministry, had spoken about the tax exemption to political parties, the Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley, clarified that political parties will be treated just like any other entity for all deposits of demonetised notes post-Nov 8th. This is a welcome clarification which confirms that the government is staying with the original script in terms of demonetisation being used as a weapon against black money. But at the same time it throws up a concern about a ’committed’ bureaucracy wherein it may be construed that the bureaucrats akin to dogs are willing to sit on their back legs in an erect position on their haunches with their tongues lolling out to please their masters.


In Politicians Deal Making, Interests of Citizens Are Sacrificed

The role of the Opposition in Parliamentary democracy is to take up issues by which it can match swords with the party in power and through that contest try and come back to government and rule the country. In the lack of understanding of this basic and fundamental principle has Rahul Gandhi erred in judgment by falling for the trap laid out by Narendra Modi in agreeing to meet the Congress Vice-President on the last day of the just concluded Winter Session of Parliament. Just on the penultimate day Rahul Gandhi had announced that he had bullet-proof evidence on the ‘personal corruption’ of the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi and because of that he was not being allowed to speak in Parliament. Thus what changed on 16th Dec 2016 that Rahul Gandhi suddenly became silent on the ‘personal corruption’ issue and thought it fit to raise the issue of writing off of farmers’ loans with an eye on the upcoming UP elections? This apparently immature act which has become the hallmark of Rahul Gandhi in his random forays of coming before the arc lights of politics put paid to the rare Opposition unity that had been forged on the demonetization issue and the woes that it had imposed on the entire country. The joint march scheduled by the Opposition parties to Rasthrapati Bhawan to submit a memorandum on the demonetization issue was called off in a huff by parties other than the Congress because of Rahul Gandhi meeting the PM alone. The demonetization issue affected the entire population and was not a sectoral issue based on which all the Opposition parties had got together was something that was lost on Rahul Gandhi as also the chance to show the strength of a joint Opposition to the BJP which has a dominant position in the lower House of Parliament.

In another sense one cannot understand what Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of ‘personal corruption’ of the Prime Minister have to do with the demonetization issue unless it is a tangential attempt to show that Narendra Modi’s attempt to occupy the high moral pedestal of fighting against corruption through demonetization is suspect because of him being personally corrupt. But what comes out is that this is a clear example of deal making between the Congress and the BJP. There was a case being heard in the Supreme Court brought in by Prashant Bhushan based on data from investigative reports of authorities that brought the corruption of a number of ministers in Gujarat quite some time back, Narendra Modi included, wherein some industrialists had paid substantial sums of money to these ministers. This could be the corruption that Rahul Gandhi is talking about. In anticipation that the Congress could rake up the issue at the present time the BJP had decided to accelerate the Augusta Westland scam that had links to the then UPA PMO and indirectly the Gandhi family. Thus to keep the BJP temporarily quiet on the Augusta Westland case, Rahul Gandhi probably decided to bring up the ‘personal corruption’ of Narendra Modi in the hurriedly called press conference in Parliament where he was flanked by most of the lesser Opposition parties. The BJP had two options to handle this matter. The first was to extend their hand by offering Rahul Gandhi a meeting with Narendra Modi for which there was an already existing request by the Congress party. This was done and Rahul Gandhi fell for it scuttling in the process the unity that had been forged with the Opposition parties on the demonetization issue. Narendra Modi had the other choice in handling Rahul Gandhi, as Arvind Kejriwal has put it and that was if the Congress Vice President spoke about Modi’s involvement in corruption then Modi would have had Robert Vadra arrested on the number of real estate scams that this person is believed to be involved in. But this latter option would have allowed Modi’s name to be linked openly with corruption and Vadra’s arrest could have put the cat among the pigeons making the future progressions in the matter uncertain. So for Modi it was convenient that Rahul Gandhi walked into the meeting. Thus you will see the demonetization issue which is a national problem was reduced to a game of chess between two political adversaries about their involvement in corruption. Is this in the interest of the nation is what we should all ask? Will we continue to be played with in sanctioning the corruption of our political masters and taking sides as to which scam is bigger or justifying scams by the number of them that can be attributed to one political personage/party or other and stating that it is our turn now?

Thus you see the affairs of the people are the last the last thing that is in the minds of our politicians since they are obsessed with protecting themselves from criminal action against various scams and preserving their ill-gotten money. All parties are the same and this is the common refrain among them – Protect Your Own.
We have seen yet another session of Parliament washed out without much work. This is costly for the nation. This also means that our legislators are not working. For this should not the principle of – No Work, No Pay – apply. In contrast in the next session you will see the MP’s bring forward the bill enhancing their salaries and perks which has been long pending. They will also pass it without we, the common citizens of this country able to say anything about it and voice our common opinion that they do not deserve a raise. Thus you will see that in our form of democracy the citizens who are the building blocks of the system are completely disregarded once an election takes place and then for the next 5 years we see our legislators do with impunity whatever their like. This has to change.

Hence should we look at throwing out these corrupt bunch of politicians and try to change the system of government to a Presidential form in the hope that a new system and hopefully  a more able and honest person as President can lead this country out of the present morass that it is in.


***********************************

Sunday, December 18, 2016

VOX POPULI

by

S Kamat
as
Aam Admi

Issue: 180              Date:  19.12.2016

 
Contents:

1.      India Should Go For Presidential Form of Government
2.      Discount Opinions On Demonetisation From Those Not Affected
3.      Modi Must Quit
4.      The Rot in India Is Deep, Dark and Extensive



India Should Go For Presidential Form of Government

We have in the last week seen two important personages of our Parliament claim that they were not ‘allowed’ to speak in the House. One was the leader of the present government, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the other was Rahul Gandhi, Vice President of the Congress party which is the principal Opposition party in the present House. Based on these claims which signal a clear threat to Parliamentary democracy since if these figures claim their being prevented from raising their voice on behalf of the people what of the lesser known MP’s. Thus the status of Parliament which should be the representative of the voice of the people through their elected legislators is clearly in danger. We have also seen in the previous UPA regime and in the present NDA dispensation how Parliament is held at ransom by MP’s who deliberately disrupt proceedings and do not allow the Houses to function. Each party whether they are in government or in the Opposition, blame each other for the paralysis of Parliament in a tit-for-tat manner. The majority of legislators around the country be they MP's or MLA's are not responsible enough and broadminded to work for the people since they are obsessed with feathering their own nests. Considering this background and the fact that the Indian people at large are known to prefer a firm hand on government, is it time for India to move into a Presidential form of government? Given that we have tried out Parliamentary democracy on the colonial British model for the last 70 years and are not sure whether it has worked or is working presently given the experience particularly over the last two decades, one thinks it is time enough to change to a Presidential form of government. 


Discount Opinions On Demonetisation From Those Not Affected

There are a few issues related to the comments made by foreign entities on India's recent demonetisation. Some countries commended Narendra Modi on the bold decision but apart from the theoretical moorings of the comments wherein it is believed that demonetisation strikes at the root of the parallel economy (black money in India terms) and corruption these countries mostly from Europe had an inherent interest in keeping Modi occupied at home since otherwise he would be bothering them to give data on Indians who had stashed their black money in these countries. In another context we have had economists like Bhagawati & Co., the first named being the sounding board of sorts for Narendra Modi on economic matters with one of his protégés heading the Niti Aayog, who have been singing the paens of demonetisation and that the 'short term pain will lead to long term gain'. These people live abroad and have no idea of the 'pain' that the common people in this country are suffering because of the cash shortage and also have no stake in the 'gain', if at all, that will accrue. We should therefore take their comments with a large pinch of salt. Such eminent people one would presume would be careful in nurturing their professional reputation since by taking sides on parochial basis or on terms of 'you rub my back, I will rub yours' does not serve them any purpose. What these people fail to understand is that the demonetisation was desirable but the way it has been put through by Narendra Modi's government leaves a lot to be desired. 


Modi Must Quit

Prime Minister Narendra Modi should resign not necessarily just for the demonetisation fiasco that he has inflicted on this country but also because he seems to be a compulsive liar apart from being a person unfit for the august office of the Prime Minister of India. This is being stated because of his comments at a Gujarat rally last week that he is not being 'allowed' to speak in Parliament. The first thing that we need to look at in this context is Modi's attendance in Parliament. You rarely find him present in either the Rajya Sabha or the Lok Sabha to which latter body he has been elected, intervening in debates relating to crucial and/or controversial matters that are before the House. The same pattern of absenteism from the Legislature defined his tenure as Chief Minister of Gujarat. The second thing is that in Parliamentary democracy the Prime Minister is given overarching precedence if he intends to speak in the House. This is a tradition established by custom and also by the respect that members of the House have towards the Prime Minister. Of the latter one does not know how much Modi commands from the Opposition benches but one must say that he has no dearth of sycophants in the Treasury benches. In fact on the issue of demonetisation as soon as Parliament convened within a week of the D-Day of 8th Nov 2016 he could have opened the winter session with a statement in both Houses. But unfortunately by that time the pictures of the queues in front of banks must have discouraged him for fear of being bombarded in Parliament. Thus Modi ran scared and retreated into his hole. This speaks of a personality that is afraid to face his peers and take criticism. This denial stems from a lack of proper education, a proper and rounded family background that has adequate emotional safety nets and the willingness to accept responsibility. In such situations these individuals tend to exhibit bravado which is evident from Modi's comments of a 56 ins. chest and the tendency to make immature off-the-cuff statements. One of these recently was Modi's statement that he shares a good relationship with Trump upon Donald Trump winning the US Presidential elections and that he 'knows him well'. Now the world has doubts whether Trump knows himself well given his penchant to make outrageous statements and subsequent retractions for Modi to say that he 'knows'  Trump well! One of the delusions that people like Modi suffer from is that they tend to put themselves above the position that they occupy, in this case that of the Prime Minister of India . Most of the relationships that Modi shares with world leaders is because of his being the Prime Minister of India  and not of him as an individual. The demonetisation fiasco that was launched by him on the country is part of the same bravado and is representative of the fact that he acts without thinking about the consequences. Another way of putting it is to remind him of the old adage - Act in haste and repent in leisure. Modi also needs to realise that his scale of operations has now expanded beyond Gujarat and what could work for a State may not work for the whole of India and the repercussions are on a much larger scale also. This latter fact he must have come to realise after the demonetisation fiasco though publicly he may not be willing to accept it. We can give Modi at least that much grace to him. There is also a certain amount of narcissism and a touch of megalomania in Modi's character as we have all seen. Thus being afraid of being pulled up for performance what with a stuttering economy, foreign policy initiatives with all our neighbours going wrong especially Pakistan and being afraid of being asked about the bringing back of black money, Modi jumped into the demonetisation measure. This was done essentially to pre-empt criticism but in the unfortunate implementation of the measure it has ended into a fiasco. Thus given the present state of affairs it is best that Narendra Modi resigns or as reported a few months ago, there needs to be a 'palace coup' engineered internally by the BJP or initiated by the Sangh Parivar to remove him from the helm of affairs.


The Rot in India Is Deep, Dark and Extensive

The rot in India is deep, dark and extensive. This has been brought to the fore again post-demonetisation. Immediately after PM Narendra Modi's announcement that the Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 were no longer legal tender, the whole of India got into the act starting from the night of 8th Nov itself to safeguard their money, much of it black and maybe some white. Phone lines across the country were jammed that night with people jabbering away to find out the best way out of the situation. Jewellery shops were ambushed across the country with people desperate to convert their demonetised notes into gold, a safer hedge against government intervention apart from being a good investment option.

Vultures descended immediately thereafter in the form of wheeler dealers, commission agents and influence peddlers on those possessing large amounts of the demonetised notes promising conversion to the new and legal currency at varying rates of commission ranging from 10 - 35%. In this process a large number of gullible possessors of the demonetised notes got cheated finding themselves in the predicament of not being able to seek the help of the police to recover their 'invalid' money.


Banks and post offices were swamped post - 10th Nov when they reopened after the bank closure on 9th Nov with people seeking urgent conversion of their demonetised notes to the abysmal low limit of Rs. 4000. The reason behind the impossibly meagre amount allowed conversion in the initial instance was a supply-side constraint of the new notes and logistics considerations of delivery of notes across the banking network spread across the country. With the crowds at the banks eager to exchange money, it was but natural to have confusion on the documentation required from the depositors which many black money hoarders took advantage of by having 'currency mules' do the rounds of the banks and post offices depositing bundles of old notes multiple times at the cost of honest, regular citizens who were wanting to exchange money for their day to day cash needs. With the rush at the banks and post offices, the staff was hard-pressed and one must compliment the staff at these establishments for their patience and tolerance in the handling of the massive rush of people. However, considering the infrastructure available at these establishments, one will have serious doubts on the integrity of the records and the ability of our investigating agencies to proceed on any meaningful investigation based on this data.


Even otherwise the ability of the investigating agencies to process such a large volume of cases to their logical conclusion is debatable. Even some bank, both PSB and private, post office employees and now even RBI personnel have been found wanting in integrity and in collusion with black money holders seeking to feather their nests in this once in a lifetime opportunity. Many have been arrested and find themselves cooling their heels in jail. In the course of time you will find that IT personnel will also be drawn to the temptation of making a quick buck from settlement of cases 'quickly'. Bank employees and unions have already expressed concern on the additional workload caused by the demonetisation exercise to which has been added the complaints from the IT Department employees about the lack of manpower to pursue the impending tsunami of cases. Thus every section involved and/or impacted in the demonetisation exercise is looking to take advantage of the situation and shore up their own interests. This situation should therefore not end up with shifting the goalposts from the objective of clearing black money to 'cleaning up' the internal system of government. In line with this RBI has announced that a vigilance team will visit each and every bank branch in the country to check the records of the accounting of demonetised notes! Exemplary aims, but is it practical? It will be like Narendra Modi asking all BJP MP's &  MLA's to submit their bank statements from Nov 8th to Amit Shah. Unfortunately there is an eerie silence from Amit Shah on whether he has received any such statements!

Looking for reasons why lately so much new currency is being seized in raids particularly of the Rs. 2000 denomination is maybe because the Aam Admi in any case does not want the note in normal circumstances considering he finds it difficult to get change which some of our rogue bankers have sensed and have thus deliberately kept the ATM's bare of currency and have been diverting these notes to the black money hoarders where at least they, the bankers that is, are being covered for their pains. Are also the bare ATM’s because of the private contractors like Brinks & CMS and others not being given the cash or their inability to meet the stringent demands of the situation? Or is it because the banks outsourced this work to private operators rather than handling it themselves or in a centralized manner through the IBA since then the ATM’s of the banks could have been fed with some currency which would also ease the crush at the bank counters?
      
RBI the apex monetary authority in the country is continuing to not accept the responsibility of ensuring adequate amount of currency to replace the demonetised notes. In the first couple of weeks after 8th Nov the RBI was nowhere in the picture with the Finance Ministry officials calling the shots on the procedures post-demonetisation. It was only later that the RBI Governor, Urjit Patel surfaced with the lame statement that he supported the demonetisation. Thereafter we find the RBI personnel adopting a patriarchal approach in handling the cash crisis. Their spokesmen in true pedagogic style recount and reel out the numbers in billions of the various notes that they have put out through the banking system little realising that that effort is just not enough since the attempt and objective should be to ease and/or eliminate the cash shortage. This approach of the RBI indicates the way of their functioning since as long as the going is good and top-down instructions are the order of the day, they are kings of their domain. But the moment something goes wrong as in the present demonetisation scenario and the pitch becomes difficult to bat on, they find themselves completely out of their depth and fall flat on their face. 

The government is indirectly facilitating this crazy rush at the banks/ATM’s by thrashing around in the manner of a drowning man clutching at straws with far-fetched alternate options like promoting cashless transactions to counter the cash shortage as the next 'great idea' to catch up with the developed world! Little do the authorities realise that for going cashless it is important to have a minimum level of education across the population to be able to understand the principle and the mechanics of the transactions. There is also a need to have proper and reliable coverage of the Net and the mobile networks across the country to have transactions go through with integrity and without interruptions. Because the moment a transaction does not go through particularly in the rural areas and among the urban poor, the bewilderment of the users goes up manifold and the acceptance of the process suffers. There can be no reversal of wrong transactions and therefore the user stands to lose the transacted amount is something that not all persons could afford. Already with the number of POS terminals on the increase, we have had server breakdowns jamming the smooth flow of transactions indicating that unless systems are not robust enough to handle large traffic you will only have more intention than any action to put through transactions. With cashless transactions not going through, the trade outlets would insist on their preferred mode of payment – cash.

As indicated earlier there are many to take advantage of the gullible and ill-informed public and swindle them. Like we have already in Goa just last week card skimmers being used under the guise of POS terminals at some trade outlets and claiming that the transaction not gone through, capturing the card details and presenting thereafter a regular POS terminal to complete the transaction. The skimmed card details were later used to prepare duplicate cards to draw money from the customer accounts. Here there was collusion between the trade outlets and the card skimmers. Who will be responsible for such malpractices? Does the account holder get reimbursed by the bank or does he have to fight the battle to get the money back himself? What happens if the account holder is unable to bear the loss – temporary or otherwise? Such problems coming to the rural areas and the urban poor could be very critical and affect common people severely. Thus in summary the government is tailoring their cashless programs for the urban elite and the upwardly mobile segments of the population at the cost of those that are less fortunate. Such people, actually the larger part of the population, will find themselves slowly excluded from the process of monetary transactions further accentuating the divide between urban India and the rural Bharat. A study commissioned by ASSOCHAM and done by Ernst & Young positions that mobile and card fraud is going to jump 65% in the next year considering the rising trend seen in the last 3 years. And this study was done prior to the demonetisation exercise which if you factor in the frauds could go up exponentially, potentially putting every other cashless transaction at risk. 

There is also the issue of cost of the cashless transactions and banks have been asked by government to waive the cost of debit card swiping which the banks and even RBI are resisting saying the minimum cost has to be charged to trade outlets. There will also be then the preference of trade outlets to take more debit cards than credit cards since the former is lower cost for them. These knee jerk reactions in the rush to promote cashless transactions for essentially a gaffe of the government in creating an artificial shortage of cash is throwing up needless choices and alternatives. There is also no time being given for the usage of different cashless products to evolve in the normal course and get public acceptance. Adding to all this in the manner of a commercial establishment the government is said to be coming up with lucky draws for using cashless transactions which an amused public will watch from the sidelines akin to seeing a headless chicken with its head cut running helter-skelter in its last death throes. In these circumstances the user bewildered by choice will prefer to retreat into his shell and allow the prevailing dust on cashless operations to settle down before he decides on his option. The cost of cashless operations is around 1-3% among the various options which the trade outlets have to pay the operators like Paytm, e-wallets, payment gateways, banks etc. This amount will as is common in India will be recovered from the customers. Thus moving to cashless operations involves a transfer of resources from the common man to mainly the private operators running these operations. Hence some economists have opined that in this method and in the worst case scenarios  1-3% of the GDP will be transferred to a limited number of private operators making them richer. In this context one needs to note that the owner of Paytm just last week sold 1% of his share holding in the Co. for Rs. 325 crores! Was this boost in share value because of the push that Narendra Modi gave Paytm by appearing in their full page ads in national newspapers in the first few days after 8th Nov?  Thus like they say for some it is chandi hi chandi while for others it is sar pe lathi. Some come with their Bhagya made for them by benefactors while others have to suffer their Bhagya alone.

In conclusion one must say that any measure has to be thought out in great detail and executed with precision which unfortunately has not been the hallmark of Narendra Modi's demonetisation measure.


************************************